Reach out for feedback on your work,
private coaching, or workshops
for groups or graduate programs. I also offer
Japanese to English translation and writing support.
Set up an informal meeting today and learn more.
Content: Discuss narrative techniques that include interior monologue, dramatic monologue,
letter narration, diary narration, subjective narration, detached autobiography, memoir, anonymous narration,
dual character point of view, multiple character point of view, no character point of view, and more.
Time: Tuesdays 9-10:30 pm (Japan time); or, various other times may be available.
Platform: Signal and other platforms, or in-person.
Contact: Contact today for more information.
Flow: Enjoy expressing your understanding of the text. Try and facilitate conversations
with engaging questions and friendly feedback.
The image comes from my desk. It is Murakami’s translation of short stories by Grace Paley, which includes “Distance,” or 道のり.
It's a noted example of subjective narration.
Subjective narration usually features a character who recounts the past to a general audience.
The narrator is limited by their awareness, which may be reliable or unreliable, and exposes people in time periods,
class, education, prejudices, abilities, and shortcomings.
Subjective narratives also expose limitations on knowledge and raise questions about what lurks in the shadows.
Understanding the limits of subjective narration challenges the boundaries of “objective” narration. When are editorial choices subjective vs. objective?
Every storyteller is fallible. Personal choices exist, and narratives often serve identity, corporate donors, or interested parties.
When people claim to be objective, their narrative is often called into doubt. Consider how few people trust government PR representatives or
corporate journalism -- trust levels are below 30%, as few think they are being given objective reality.
Unlike the pretense of objective narration, subjective narrators, like Paley’s, build trust through authentic feelings, admitting weakness,
sharing vulnerabilities,
and invoking empathy through shared experience. As you read this piece, consider what you trust or don’t trust about the narrator.
How does this influence your understanding of distance? Do you feel invited to share her thoughts with cynicism or an open embrace?